Forum Topics

Pro & Anti LTN Campaigners Unite to Tackle Air Pollution

Arguments in favour of the low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) introduced in parts of Acton include a reduction in air pollution resulting from less car use. Campaigners opposed to the LTNs counter that longer journeys caused by LTNs will result in increased air pollution.So, in fact, both sides at least AGREE that air pollution is bad and that we should minimise it. And that’s scarcely surprising when we know that in London, air pollution contributes to in excess of 9,400 premature deaths every year, and costs the health system annually between £1.4 billion and £3.7 billion.The main source of this pollution is road vehicles – but it’s not just their exhaust gases. The latest research carried out for the government indicates that dust from brake wear, tyre wear and road surface wear currently constitute over 60% (by mass) of particulate emissions (PM2.5 and PM10) from road transport. These fragments pollute the air and will eventually be washed into rivers and the sea. Electric vehicles do not solve this dust problem and can even make it worse, as they tend to be heavier due to their batteries. Currently no legislation is in place to limit or reduce these particles.So what can be done? Well, apart from walking or cycling instead of driving whenever you can, there’s one very simple thing you can do: Buy the LIGHTEST, smallest car that is sufficient for you. Doing so reduces every type of emission. By contrast, an SUV weighs on average 40% more than a normal car, due to its size and 4-wheel transmission.But there’s worse! Apart from the increased dust due to the extra weight, the International Energy Agency has found that SUVs are the SECOND LARGEST CAUSE of the global rise in carbon dioxide emissions over the past decade, eclipsing all shipping, aviation, heavy industry and even trucks. Each year, SUVs emit 700 mega-tonnes of CO2, about the entire output of the UK and Netherlands combined. On top of all this, studies of accident statistics in the USA found that a far higher percentage of pedestrians hit by SUVs died compared with those hit by a normal car. Having to share the road with 2-ton monsters puts people off buying a small car or cycling – the very things we need to encourage to tackle both air pollution and climate change.Already the European Transport Safety Council and the UK Citizens’ Assembly on Climate Change (set up by the House of Commons) have discussed a ban on SUVs in cities. Sooner or later governments will have to legislate, but meanwhile we in Acton can do our bit. If you have an over-sized vehicle, simply commit to never buying another, and tell your friends why. And if you don’t have one, then keep it that way.The UK will host the UN Climate Summit COP26 in Glasgow this November; it will be the largest summit the UK has ever hosted, bringing together representatives from nearly 200 countries to discuss how to avoid catastrophic climate change. So, whatever we think of LTNs and whatever car we currently own, there is no better time for us to unite in a commitment to the planet for the sake of our children.SEE:====1) “How to Save Our Planet”, WWF International [8:27]. Sir David Attenborough explains how humans can take charge of our future and save our planet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Puv0Pss33M2) ‘Humans’ - episode 5 of ‘A Perfect Planet’, on BBC iPlayer.REFERENCES:===========Demystifying Air Pollution in London – Report by London Councils: https://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/node/33224Pollution warning over car tyre and brake dust: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-48944561Air Quality Expert Group: Non-Exhaust Emissions from Road Traffic. Prepared for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat09/1907101151_20190709_Non_Exhaust_Emissions_typeset_Final.pdfGrowing preference for SUVs challenges emissions reductions in passenger car market. International Energy Agency: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/growing-preference-for-suvs-challenges-emissions-reductions-in-passenger-car-market

Donald Power ● 2077d10 Comments ● 2028d

Where is Richmondshire?

In the opening salvo for 6th May, Labour Council leader Julian Bell is quoted as comparing Ealing to Richmondshire when claiming the Borough is deprived of cash by 'Tory cronyism', the mantra of Mayor Sadiq Khan for the last 6 years. “Two homes” is one of 11 London boroughs Labour leaders demanding the Chancellor Rishi Sunak give them more taxpayers money from the £4.8 billion Levelling Up Funding allocated according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation, the Government measure of poverty.Khan and his cronies are claiming just 3 London boroughs got the highest ranking to receive government cash along with Mr Sunak’s own constituency of Richmond in Yorkshire, taking a perverse pride in the social deprivation. “Two Homes” is quoted as saying that after a decade of Tory inflicted austerity the government is refusing refund councils the huge costs of responding to Covid-19 both demonstrably false statements.  He also lied about the Chancellor throwing money at better off Tory constituencies and downgrading the help for the most deprived areas in the country.Khan’s bid to stay in office is based on lies about what he calls the “blatant unfairness” of those responsible for the failures in London not being rewarded for failure. For 5 years too many Londoners have lived in the most deprived communities in the country, with stark inequalities in health and life expectancy which Covid 19 has served to exasperate yet Khan and Bell refuse to accept their part in this to falsely claim London has been ignored from Government funding dedicated to tackling inequality. Khan insists it is all Rishi Sunak’s fault. Mayor Sadiq Khan is running a smear campaign, claiming Government Ministers have committed fraud in the distribution of funds to their own constituencies and making his trade mark Critical Race remarks about “pork barrel politics” to attack the Government’s Levelling Up Prospectus which decides a constituency’s priority on “its need for economic recovery, regeneration and improved connectivity”. Khan and the 11 other Labour run London boroughs seem proud to have become poorer and wants those responsible to get more money.The Mayor of London accuses the Government of displaying “constant anti-London rhetoric” and has said that “levelling down London will only make us all poorer”. The Mayor is funded by direct government grant and, as a precepting authority, collects money from business rates and local Council Tax. The GLA is unique with its presidential government system that gave Sadiq Khan immense powers he has used very badly. As Mayor of London for increasing the spending on City Hall Staff by 82%. Staff costs in Boris Johnson's final budget for 2016-17 were £36m, while the 2020-21 budget under Mr Khan show them to be at £65.5m. It is clear that while thousands of Londoners have lost jobs, local authority bureaucrats are prospering. False flags about Tory corruption will not stop Londoners worrying about how dangerous the city has become with rising crime and increasing violent deaths Sadiq Khan has proven himself incapable of stopping. Each breath Londoners take prove Khan’s environmental failures but it his failure to build much needed homes while giving Labour Party members and donners millions for their advice and websites now all promoting the Marxist BLM that has been Sadiq Khan’s legacy. The Government provided £4.82 billion grant for the provision of more affordable housing in London. Mayor Khan selected Catalyst Housing Group as his development partner for the redevelopment of the St Ann’s Hospital site in Tottenham despite their numerous Planning Contraventions Notices and Judgements by the Homes and Communities Agency. The Mayor of London has designated 50 of 934 small flats “affordable” and claims this will enable local people to own homes so St Ann’s qualifies for Central Government funding as one of the largest community-led housing schemes in London. Ealing based Catalyst rapacious business practice looks set to increase homeless throughout London. Catalyst Shared Ownership Equity Loans retain 75% of the property while charging £345 per week for loan repayments with each household having to paid additional thousands on maintenance fees each year. Of the 132 South Acton flats purchased through a £70 million Loan arranged by Ealing Labour Councillors including Yvonne Johnston in 2011, over 80% of the original 132 buyers have left by March 2020 with Brentford County Court recording 347 Possession Cases brought by Catalyst over Equity Loan defaults between 2012 and 2020, some flats being sold 3 or 4 times over. Catalyst tells purchasers they will get Housing Benefit to cover loans repayments and when the money they do get falls short Ealing Council moves the evicted families into containers. And blame the Tories.Catalyst Housing Group is building another 900+ flats for shared ownership near the unfinished Acton Mainline train station, another victim of Khan’s disastrous management of Transport for London. This hugely profitable development is the result of 2016 Cannes meetings and payments from Tom Titherington, Catalyst Housing Group’s Executive Director of Property and Growth to Julian Bell and Lucy Taylor, Ealing’s Director of Regeneration. “Two Homes” actually expects people to believe he and his staff, whose salaries have increased in line with those at City Hall, cycled all the way from Ealing to the South of France for charity.

Martin Cain ● 2052d1 Comments ● 2051d

DISHONEST TRADING.

Misleading information provided by energy switching company Look After My Bills to the public has been addressed by the Advertising Standards Authority. Below is a post shared by Nick Blagg, a member of:                                                                                                                                                                        "Look After My Bills Problem Reporting Page."                                                                                                                                                     Nick Blagg shared a link.The complaint made to the advertising standards agency against LAMB has been upheld !! It feels like a partial victory to me based on what the ruling is (see below) but it’s still a win and the more of us that continue to complain the more pressure is applied.  Keep it up guys. 👍🏻Dear Mr Blagg,Thank you for your continued patience.  Further to the below, we received another complaint which raised issues similar to those highlighted in your complaint.  Based on the information you and the other complainant provided, we considered that advertising content from Look After My Bills was likely to break the advertising rules we apply.  Therefore, we contacted the advertiser to ask for their assurance that future ads do not misleadingly imply that users of the service will have access to every single energy company and every single energy deal on the market.  They have provided this assurance.This now resolves your complaint, and the case will be closed.  Basic information including the advertiser’s name and where the ad appeared will be published on www.asa.org.ukThank you for bringing this matter to our attention.Kind regards,JamesJames JonesComplaints ExecutiveDirect Line 020 7492 2214Please note, I do not work on FridaysAdvertising Standards AuthorityCastle House, 37-45 Paul StreetLondon EC2A 4LSTelephone 020 7492 2222

Neil Milkins ● 2051d0 Comments ● 2051d