Forum Topics

Withdrawal of proposed increases in Resident Parking Permit Charges and introduction of shared use p

There is a second petition doing the rounds which stands a better chance of winning the council round, providing it gets enough signatures. There is nothing to stop anyone signing both petitions.  This one has been written by the residents in Southfields Ward and unlike other Wards, Julian Bell has agreed to meet with them and their Lib Dem Ward Councillors.The current proposals which include a borough roll out of Order 4114 (removal of some resident bays and introduction of shared bays amongst other things) to allow commuters and persons going to Heathrow to park close to Elizabeth Line and other stations.  Whilst resident permits will be made up of location and vehicle emissions rating, the incomers will only be charged on location and pay far less than they would at stations outside the borough or at the airport. Coupled with the inconvenience of an incomer parking for an estimated £4.00 a day outside your house for a couple of weeks just adds insult to injury. Ealing Borough is 55.53 kmsq, as a Zone 2 borough we have contributed £35 a msq, (you do the maths)  for the building of Crossrail/Elizabeth Line. Crossrail was built to stop people driving into London.  Why are Ealing now encouraging people to do this? Their own Transport Strategy has been written to positively discourage its residents from driving. “Research indicates that annually, up to 9,000 early deaths across London and 387 early deaths within LB Ealing have been attributed to poor air quality” (from vehicle emissions). The increase of traffic at peak times rat running through the borough will also increase the potential for RTAs. And all this to raise mere extra £250,000 is just plain stupid and clearly unfair.Please read and sign this petition:http://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/ePetitions/tabid/96/ID/50/Withdrawal-of-proposed-increases-in-Resident-Parking-Permit-Charges-and-introduction-of-shared-use-parking-bays.aspx

Libby Kemp ● 3037d6 Comments ● 3035d

Bus route consultation - 440 and 27/N27

There is a new consultation from TfL for bus routes 440 and 27/N27. The consultation runs until 12th August Their overview is: Last year we consulted on proposed changes to a number of bus routes in west London, as part of our plans for the Elizabeth line. Since then we have carried out further work to improve the bus network in the area. We have now developed a new set of proposals for route 440 that would: provide a new direct bus link between Gunnersbury, Acton and the planned Elizabeth line station at Acton Main Line improve bus links into Chiswick Business Park from South Acton Estate provide a direct link between stops at the northern end of Chiswick Business Park and Gunnersbury station Our review of bus services serving inner west London also revealed a number of routes that were running with a lot of spare capacity (buses that are not full). We are therefore proposing the following changes to route 27: make route 27 more reliable by terminating it at Hammersmith Grove, which will remove the least-used section of the route (between Hammersmith and Chiswick Business Park) create a short new local link from King Street to Glenthorne Road and Hammersmith Grove turn buses around at Hammersmith Bus Station, removing an under-used section of the route at night between the bus station and Hammersmith Grove (this truncated route would operate as the ‘N27’) We are also proposing to extend route 440 from Stonebridge Park and Wembley via Harrow Road. Those proposals are being consulted on separately 
Your browser does not support inline PDF viewing.Please download the PDF. There is more information at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/buses/routes-27-and-440/?cid=routes-27-440

Paul Webster ● 3038d0 Comments ● 3038d