Successful challenge by five councils would result in budget shortfall
The expansion is due to take place in August. Picture: Hillingdon Council
February 23, 2023
City Hall has no financial plan for if it loses a legal challenge over its attempt to expand the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), Sadiq Khan has confirmed.
The Mayor of London revealed that no budgetary preparations had taken place for the eventuality of losing the legal challenge brought against City Hall by the borough councils of Bexley, Bromley, Harrow and Hillingdon, along with Surrey County Council.
The five councils are all opposed to the ULEZ expansion and have together filed a lawsuit, which claims that the move would be unlawful.
The question of whether there would be any impact on City Hall’s budget if it lost the legal challenge was raised by Conservative London Assembly Member Nick Rogers at a Tuesday (21 February) meeting.
Mr Rogers asked the Mayor, “What would be the budgetary consequence of any delay or change to the ULEZ plans?”
Mr Khan replied, “I’ve been Mayor now for seven years, minus a few weeks, and I’ve experienced many legal challenges to TfL [Transport for London], as did the previous mayor – so there’s always legal challenges when you’re running a public transport body like TfL.
“What you don’t do is work on the basis that you’re going to lose a legal challenge, you work on the basis that the plans that we have will go ahead.
“So there aren’t any plans about the consequences to the budget of those five Conservative councils succeeding in their judicial review.”
Mr Rogers, who represents Hounslow, Kingston and Richmond on the Assembly, followed up: “So you’ve no contingency plans for if the case is lost?”
“If the councils win, no,” said Mr Khan.
The ULEZ currently covers the area inside the North and South Circular Roads, but Mr Khan intends to expand the zone to cover all of Greater London – effectively taking it up to most roads inside the M25 motorway – on 29 August. Drivers of non-compliant vehicles within the ULEZ have to pay a daily charge of £12.50.
The expansion plan has come up against opposition from councils in outer London and the home counties, who mainly argue that the zone’s expansion will do little to improve air quality – and is being introduced at the worst possible time owing to the cost-of-living crisis.
Mr Khan claims that five million more Londoners will breathe cleaner air if the ULEZ expands to cover the whole city and often points out that around 4,000 premature deaths in London per year are due in part to poor air quality.
In Tuesday’s meeting, Mr Rogers also asked whether any timetable changes had been made due to the legal challenge: “Have you taken any action at all, no pausing of rollouts, no pausing of procurement, nothing like that at all?”
Mr Khan said no pausing had taken place.
Finally, Mr Rogers asked whether enforcement cameras to monitor the expanded ULEZ were going up yet.
Mr Khan’s chief of staff, David Bellamy, replied, “Yes, the process is happening. The rollout has been happening initially on TfL-owned roads, and then we’re working obviously with boroughs and going through the appropriate processes with them for the rollout.”
At the end of January, only 16 out of 24 outer London boroughs had agreed to have cameras erected on their roads.
Some of those delays were due to approval being required from a full council meeting rather than there being in-principle objections.
TfL already has the legal power to install about two-thirds of the new required cameras because they will be placed on top of existing traffic lights.
TfL also has the authority to erect cameras on borough roads but has said it would prefer to do this with local consent.
Noah Vickers - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact firstname.lastname@example.org and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the ch
February 23, 2023
. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.