Forum Topics

Goldsmiths Arms Freehold back on the market

We received notice today of the owner's intention to dispose of the Goldsmiths Arms. As it is protected as an Asset of Community Value they need to notify the community and give them an opportunity to bid. We are supposed to have 6 weeks notice but the council have just informed us. Deadline for expression of interest is 31st December. In the meantime the owner can still proceed with the planning application to demolish the pub and build 72 new homes.  If the owner gets the planning permission he seeks he will then sell the freehold to Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing but first he needs to comply with the ACV and offer it to the community.A community group can make a bid to buy but the owners do not have to accept.  It just gets another obstacle to planning permission out of the way.  In line with the draft Mayors Plan for London the owners need to show that they have marketed the asset as a pub.  So this offer to us might be used to show that they have offered it as a pub.We can accept this as an opportunity to keep the Goldsmiths Arms a pub. We need to email the council before the 31st December to register our interest.  We need a meeting to agree this.  We then have 6 months to develop and submit our bid.St Dunstans Church is available for use Thursday and Friday evenings  I know this is not ideal re xmas.  If you can make one or both of these evenings can you let me know.  I will arrange the meeting for the evening that most people can make.  Please tell people about this.  The owners may not market this offer widely but we can.

Jacqueline Davis ● 2870d6 Comments ● 2870d

Goldsmiths Arms

Looking at the council website this morning it appears that permission was granted on Friday to prune the tree in the garden of the Goldsmiths Arms.We want to thank everyone who was able to register their objection.  The council received 64 comments of which 62 objected to the pruning and two supported it.  Reading the two that supported the application I'm inclined to think that they meant to object as in one there was no comment and the second was an objection.This shows that we are not seasoned campaigners and there is a need to help each other as we stand up against greedy property developers and council bureaucracy.At least we have brought it to the planning committees attention that this is part of a larger plan to demolish the Goldsmiths Arms and replace it with 72 flats.As you probably know Homebase are adding an additional 3 storeys to provide 31 extra flats.  This is a warning to us that  developers can change their plans at any time as many times as they want.  We need to keep focussed on keeping the Goldsmiths Arms a pub.  Once it's gone it's gone.  My feeling is that the application from the proposed developer to prune a tree might have been to test the strength of opposition.  We must do better than 62 objections next time.  62 people wanting the pub to stay a pub is not strong against 72 new homes.  We have over 2,500 signatures in the petition. So we know the strength of opposition is there.  We must stand together and be seen and heard in our objecting.The developers have told us that they intend to submit their plans next week to go to the planning meeting scheduled for the 16th January.  They have deliberately chosen to do this over the xmas holidays.  They are hoping that we will be distracted and not put a strong case forward.  We need to step up to ensure that the Goldsmiths Arms remains a pub and a community facility.  If we all do a little bit we can show the strength of feeling in our community. A community working together is powerful.  Many thanks for all the support we have received so far.

Jacqueline Davis ● 2881d3 Comments ● 2880d

Westminster's blitz on freebies to restore trust in planning process.

Shame LBE's Standards Committee (do we even have one?) are on permanent holiday. Anyone for MIPIM? More Towers Vicar? :-Westminster council is clamping down on hospitality after admitting accepting “excessive and unnecessary” freebies from planning applicants has become “normalised”.The local authority’s standards committee said staff and councillors should ideally “retain a distance” from applicants and land owners in order to “maintain trust” in the service.The new directive comes after the high-profile resignation of councillor Robert Davis who accepted gifts and hospitality 893 times over six years. These included tickets to West End shows, dinners in top restaurants, and trips to the south of France — and included entertainment provided by property developers.Mr Davis, formerly deputy leader of the Conservative-run council and, until last year, the chairman of its planning committee, denies any wrongdoing but stepped down on October 10 after a town hall inquiry ruled he had breached the authority’s code of conduct.Fake robes: Robert Davis wore replica Lord Mayor’s garb at an event at a school in Georgia, despite the trip not being sanctioned by Westminster council (Lindsay Moscarello/North Fulton Neighbor)The new report, by the council’s monitoring officer Tasnim Shawkat, is set to be discussed at a meeting tonight. It states it would be “good practice” for staff and councillors to keep meetings strictly about planning applications, pre-applications and local plans.It follows an independent review by the Planning Advisory Service, part of the Local Government Association, which found in October that although there was no impropriety regarding hospitality among staff, their accepting of it from planning applicants was “excessive and unnecessary”.It also said the way Westminster councillors accepted hospitality was unlike other planning services in the country. Westminster sources said the new rules were to “remind councillors how to behave” as part of a “culture change” needed in the planning department.The rules say that any gifts or hospitality packages costing more than £25 have to be declared.Westminster rejects plans for 24-hour casino next to churchMr Davis had referred himself to the council’s monitoring officer in February, who concluded that he did not act unlawfully but that he had breached the councillors’ code of conduct.The case prompted a number of internal reviews, resulting in the monitoring officer now calling for members to act with increased caution and rigour.The report warned councillors to consider how the public would perceive the acceptance of any gifts or hospitality offered.Adam Hug, opposition leader at Westminster, said he welcomed the “long overdue recognition” that the council’s approach to hospitality was excessive.The council called the review the start of a “new era of openness”, with further measures “to increase transparency in planning decisions” coming next year. A spokesman said: “We’ve already made significant changes, opening up our decisions to more scrutiny and making sure all meetings councillors have about planning applications take place in council offices with officers present.”SOURCE: Evening Standard 6/12/18 - Benedict Moore-Bridgerhttps://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/westminster-clamping-down-on-freebies-to-restore-trust-in-planning-process-a4010186.html?amp#click=https://t.co/lhmR1abCrD

Rosco White ● 2883d5 Comments ● 2882d