Forum Topic

Final genre for this month’s films seen is a British documentary film about the life of the well-known lady from Neasden, who at the age of 16 bursts on the model scene in the mid-60s and then proves herself to be a very hard working and adept all round performer as she transitions with great success into singing, films and theatre.The film follows a straight line through her life story from her lucky breakthrough in being given an early iconic hairstyle and photo shoot followed by a spread in the Daily Express fashion pages. I am old enough to remember the breakthrough she achieved and all the criticism around her success, as reflected in the contemporary excruciating interview questions and interviews shown, the most memorable being her taking down of Woody Allen. There are some hilarious interviews with Joanna Lumley about what being a model at that time involved in showing how different Twiggy was in breaking that mould both in the UK and then the USA (her NY arrival seems in impact to mirror the Beatles first USA arrival). The film does include some strange interviewees (Brooke Shields and Sienna Miller) giving their thoughts on how Twiggy was treated but few later famous UK models (Kate Moss or Naomi Campbell for example). Underlying it all is the strong personality of Twiggy being very clear on what she wants and willing to take risks. With little scandal or bad media to divert interest you end up enjoying her common-sense approach to her life and career.Interesting that at the Thursday afternoon matinee with over a half full cinema, I was the only male in the audience!

Joe Conneely ● 18d

The new film from the Korean writer/director (Bong Joon Ho) of the breakthrough film "Parasite", including winning best film Oscar.I am not a great lover of sci-fi and fantasy films which genre this film is firmly based in but do enjoy Korean cinema with their different takes on events. Probably best described as a wacky satire, Robert Pattinson plays the luckless Mickey who signs on for a future space mission to a new planet four years travel away. The only problem is that he has volunteered as an "expendable" which means he is automatically used for anything risky or dangerous. Due to a new process of "reprinting", a new replacement copy of Mickey can be made every time he dies, hence his being No. 17 at the start of the film (his back story told in flashback over the first third of the film shows how he got to 17).A mistake in "reprinting" No. 18 ahead of schedule leads to the quandary of which copy should survive. Told against a backdrop of the spaceship being commanded by a failed US senator determined to establish a new world community with his messianic wife and himself ruling (truly manic performances from Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette) plus finding the target planet is an icy wasteland inhabited by "Creepers", I must admit by the final third I had given up and was just enjoying the whole farce of it all.Ironically the film’s release in 2025 against recent developments under Trump and Musk in the USA around Greenland and Canada and settlements on Mars, have probably made certain of the themes in the film more relevant than anybody can have realised when it was being made (a bit like “Casablanca” released in the 1940s when the Allies were invading North Africa)!

Joe Conneely ● 39d

Just saw this for the second time amid all the furore: the lead didn’t show up for Q&A, no audience questions and nervous looking security.Now it’s won so many nominations, there’s a serious campaign against it from Mexicans who say it’s not Mexican enough, trans lobby who say it’s not a good representation of trans issues and then there was digging into the (trans) star’s tweeting history which came up with a couple of dodgy, five- year old tweets.It may just be an anti Oscar campaign. I thought it still brilliant and original and honestly it’s a musical and a drama NOT a documentary….This is what I thought after first viewing:This is a most original movie. It’s a musical but the songs are very much incorporated into the plot and action.The central character is a badly-treated Mexican lawyer who is hired by a dangerous monster to take on a very unusual assignment. she manages and, some time later, they join forces again.I’m not going into the plot in any more detail because it is quite unusual.It’s all rather compelling and the four central actresses jointly won best actress at Cannes this year.I’d tip it to do well at BAFTA and Oscar: certainly a contender for film not in the English language.And I thought that before I sat there dutifully at the screening reading the credits (the price you pay for BAFTA screenings) and blow me, my nephew’s name came up as lead orchestra. I squeaked with astonishment. He says that just means more of his work was left on the cutting room floor than anyone else’s. But I’m a proud auntie…

Sara Nathan ● 74d