Forum Topic

LBE now legally required to declare CIL monies received.

Expect much squirming at The Ealing Kremlin?NONE too soon of course, this was looooooooong overdue and is bound to be a revealing eye opener, especially regarding all The Towers.https://www.housingtoday.co.uk/news/councils-forced-to-spell-out-details-of-cil-deals/5101382.article?fbclid=IwAR1t9yY-br8cwQ0CkHl491MleyCZuFHix8T514_mgbyYCqxy0zpSTT2y3ME#.XW4pa8L-yp0.facebookCouncils forced to spell out details of CIL dealsBy Hamish Champ2 September 2019Housing minister said residents shouldn’t be left ‘in the dark’ over how much councils receive from developersLocal councils are being forced to publish full details of how much cash they receive from developers to fund local infrastructure work around new housing schemes.Housing minister Esther McVey said reforms to the planning rules governing the community infrastructure levy (CIL) meant residents would know how much money was being spent by their local council on infrastructure such as roads or new schools.The new rules, which came into effect yesterday, meant councils will have to publish details of the deals they had struck with developers “so residents can see exactly how money will be spent investing in the future of their community”, McVey said.And from December next year local authorities will also have to publish an annual report spelling out the all the CIL agreements agreed with developers in the previous 12 months.Many councils already publish details of such funding arrangements, according to the Local Government Association (LGA).McVey said builders “spent a whopping £6bn towards local infrastructure in 2016/17” but councils had not been required to report on the total amount of funding they had received or how it was spent, “leaving residents in the dark”.She went on: “The new rules … will allow residents to know how developers are contributing to the local community when they build new homes, whether that’s contributing to building a brand new school, roads, or a doctor’s surgery that the area needs.”In another move, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has published new planning practice guidance, which the department said “seeks to further simplify advice on the CIL regime, helping communities and developers understand what is required”.The MHCLG said restrictions would also be relaxed around allowing councils the chance to fund single larger infrastructure projects from cash received from multiple schemes.Responding to the government’s announcement on detailing CIL payments, the LGA’s planning spokesman, David Renard, said: “Councils support the principle of infrastructure funding statements showing how much developers’ money is spent on local communities, and many councils already publish them.“This work needs to be fully funded and councils also need sufficient lead-in time.“The government should further reform the CIL in the upcoming Spending Round. This includes removing national exemptions, which reduce the amount of funding to invest in critical infrastructure to facilitate development, and allowing them to be decided by councils at a local level.”SOURCE:   Housing Today.CREDIT:    Libby Kemp for publicising.

Rosco White ● 2410d13 Comments

Thank you.  The following is dated February 2018 and I see NO mention of monies from any of the North Acton Towers?! 4.1 is particularly interesting: "...... use in a specific location as set out in the terms of each S106 agreement.":-2.3 Total funding available for Cabinet to commit is £6.97m, comprised of £6.805m new and £0.168m of repurposable S106 funding. The proposed uses of the funds are set out in Appendices 1 and 2. For information, included inthese proposals is S106 money received from the following large schemes in the past year: E91 Dickens Yard (Penultimate tranche) £3.302MA87 Oaks Shopping Centre Acton Phases 1 & 2 detailed £1.087MA102 Gibbon Road Acton W3 £0.430MS57 St Bernard's Hospital Phase S2, Southall £0.238MN21 Plough Inn Mandeville Road Northolt £0.221M                                    TOTAL £5.278M3. Key Implications3.1 A wide range of social, economic and environmental projects that meet the Council’s priorities can be funded by legal agreements under S106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, but these must fairly and reasonably relate in planning terms to the development proposal.4 Financial Implications4.1 S106 funds are amounts paid by developers as part of a planning agreement and are generally for a specific purpose and/or use in a specific location as set out in the terms of each S106 agreement. These funds are held in separate designated accounts within the Council’s accounts and can be for either revenue or capital expenditure. The Council currently holds £20.389m of S106 monies as set out in Tables 1 and 2 below.

Rosco White ● 2408d