Forum Topic

Acton High School-one parent's perspective on what a better school it may be!

The current situation at Acton High School (AHS) is nothing new!  In 2010 a short documentary “Waiting for 'Superman' won the Audience Award at the Sundance Film Festival.  Its title refers to a Harlem educator’s childhood belief that a superhero would fix the problems of the community.  This short documentary is a remedial study for failing public schools in the US.  In a weird way the current situation in Acton High follows its script – a failing school in which teachers fail to teach and students fail to learn, parents desperate to get their children into better schools that offer hope for the future, a proposal for an outside sponsor, the union’s opposition to this…  For those who follow current Acton events, the situation in Acton High is dire at present.  For years there have been ongoing concerns that, instead of meeting a student where s/he is and bettering them, the school seems to have been stifling progress and aiding in maintaining the status quo.  I feel that the school and in fact the teachers have not contributed to students’ learning and strive to excellency.  I feel that the bar has often been lowered, thus allowing students to fail taking responsibility for their futures.  In my opinion, it is not about definitions such as bad vs. good school/teacher/child, but about experiences created.  I am not an educations expert, but I have been to school and based on my experience there can define what I want my children to achieve while at school.  Success should be grounded in the school’s focus on accountability and high expectations for all students, regardless of race, class, additional needs or previous academic performance.  We need teachers who are committed to teaching our children how to recognize and seize a chance by increasing expectations, teaching life skills and holding students accountable for their choices.  I want an output-oriented school concerned about what the graduates do when they leave Acton High, rather than a sole focus on what they accomplished while there.  Teachers’ goal from year 7-11/13 must be to prepare their students to compete for and win the jobs of the 21st century and to remain competitive with other graduates.  Therefore, we need teachers who are motivated and able to teach our children practical skills in the area of study.  This will enable our children to develop a better understanding of what it takes to succeed at work— crucial knowledge for a student to appreciate in order to prosper in this economy.Most of us want our children to grow up prepared for the real world, rather than in a bubble, and yet many parents chose to bypass the community school and send their children to private schools instead.  After decades of bad image and poor performance reports for Acton High I can see how one would easily be persuaded to not send their child there.  In a way, this creates part of the problem for community schools, denying those schools of the possibility of raising attainment and reducing the gap between our community’s Acton High and the other schools in the area.  As parents, we must have faith, stay engaged with the school, challenge it and help it improve and become a better place for our children.  All this said, some of us have tried and failed miserably, as we feel many empty promises had been made by the school, and not because they have not necessarily wanted to.  Some of us parents are now more than ready to challenge these and to push for a greater change to our school. I do not know if I am for or against academies.  What I do know is that I want for my kids to have a fair chance in life, regardless is they went to Acton High or not.  I want my children to study locally and to be able to take part in, enrich and contribute to their community, as I would expect of them as they grow up into responsible adults.  What I also know is that there have been too many empty promises and years wasted so far and I am concerned about how this may contribute to my children’s future.  What I’ve know from before joining Acton 3 years ago is that a change is needed and have tried to support the school in achieving this.  Since Easter, we’ve had a leadership team of invested people, most of whom have been at the school for years and who now also realize that a drastic change may be what the school needs.  We need to trust in these professionals and to support them to lead Acton High into the prospect of becoming a better school for our children.  What I most definitely know right now is that Acton cannot do it all on its own and voice my support to the Local Authority and the leadership body at Acton High with the recent proposal.  I vote for Ark not because I see them as a ‘Superman’, and not because they are the only option available to Acton, but also because the Local Authority and Acton’s leadership strongly believe that Ark is the right choice.  As a parent, I will be joining forces and stand behind our school, as I do care and will continue to care for my child, for my school, for my community and for my responsibility to make this world a better place.  I know that as parents we would want to do everything we feel is right for our children.  That is how it should be and as a parent, I do not blame anyone for this.  But I want you to consider the impact you can make on your community by engaging positively with your community school.   One or two parents are not going to make a difference in fixing Acton High’s image and academic achievements.  It is a community mindset that needs to permeate every household like the attitude found in all those other schools around beating us.  We need to all rise and support Acton High to achieve being a safer, stronger, more focused, better-achieving community that fosters our children’s individuality.  At this very turbulent time, Acton High needs the support of all those who truly wants to make things better for themselves and for the children.  We know that a better educated cohort will uplift the image of the community, improve the safety, create new businesses and create higher paying jobs that will lift our entire economy.  Every person I know wants that for their community and for their kids.  The improvement of our failing community school is not merely an economic opportunity.  It is a moral issue at the core of what a community with a heart owes its children and future generations.We need a school that aspires to high academic standards and I am pleased to say that just this week the school was granted a recognition of excellency from the Chartered Institute of Educational Assessors.  I know that the average teaching contract makes this kind of teaching far harder than it has to be.  And I believe that class size, discipline and teaching load are the biggest impediments to teaching and therefore learning.  In spite of this, I believe that we must find a way to build Acton High to a more progressive institution.  And I believe we can, especially with the external support on offer currently if we want the movement to be sustainable in the long-term.  I wonder if running the school as a business with an invested leader, a clear business plan with SMART goals and a committed team of experts may actually yield better results for the students’ achievements, the school’s reputational and the community’s output?  In my opinion, just like a business, a high-quality school should pay attention to how they select, train, evaluate and motivate their staff, so they can work together to frame good practice and ensure that every student benefits from excellent learning opportunities.  I believe that treating teachers as professionals who can enable our children to become lifelong learner and to manage complex ways of thinking, rather than promising them higher salaries, will make the job more attractive.I am told Ark aspires to this too and with a push from them I have confidence that Acton High will accelerate, regardless of its location and/or name.  What I also think will benefit us is some professional teacher performance appraisal evaluations, to which Ark subscribes.  I know NEU calls this ‘outrageous,’ but think about it -- it’s not just that the evaluations are tied to how much students learn; it’s that they involve actual feedback to teachers based on what great instruction looks like as a way of engaging and stimulating our youngsters’ minds.  It is my belief that those teachers that care about their own development and the impact they have on their students would stay and perhaps even try harder, encouraged by the prospect of being rewarded by the positive contribution they make to the community.  I believe that progressive education works for any number of reasons, but primarily because it dares all stakeholders to care about the work that they do every day.  Similar to the students’ academic review process, through the appraisal process teachers and administrators all can take ownership in the work they do.  And I believe that when they do, powerful stuff can happen.As seen by the recent award of excellency, good things can happen in our community school, but those success stories are fragile as pushback forces such as the recent industrial action by the National Education Union and their demand to oppose the change within Acton High means that many of the students may be left unable to perform and achieve to their full during the stressful exam period ahead.  This may in turn lead to poor prospects around further education, idleness, increased unemployment and crime in the area.  That is why the results achieved by the Ark Partnership elsewhere are so compelling.  I am realistic that this change will not be without its challenges – for example further debates whether to have two Ark secondary schools side by side or to merge them into one springs to mind.  And in a crazy way, the latter option makes perfect sense to me, regardless of name, logo, uniform.  As long as there is a school with an ethos of best value, safe and positive experience for all students, as well as positive contribution to the community, I am not fussed.  To me, the idea of one school, two facilities, better outcomes for all does not seem like such a bad idea.  Those of us committed to see this transformation through will face pushback.  But I am not afraid of pushing back too or of being accused of pushing too hard, as I feel that if we hold firm with the changes we feel right, we will see results!  And in the words of the true Superman Christopher Reeves ‘I think a hero is an ordinary individual who finds strengths to persevere and endure in spite of overwhelming obstacles.’

Mil Bazelkova ● 2828d73 Comments

It's very early days, probably too soon to make a proper judgement if I'm honest. The kids have only been back a week so I'll tell you what I think and know from the questions I, and other mothers I know, have asked their kids. The short answer is that there has been a definite improvement in behaviour and as a result, the lessons are calmer and learning is taking place across the board, not just in top sets, which can only be a good thing.  I know however, that there have been a lot of posts on Facebook about this first week. I'm not on FB but before this thread begins to resemble the FB thread, I'd like to give my take on the first week at Ark Acton Academy, and I do so with no great authority on the matter but as someone who strongly supported Ark coming to AHS. The first day was a huge shock for some of the pupils, not all but definitely some, including my daughter who is now in year 9. The structure of the school day, how pupils conduct themselves, the consequences they receive and how quickly they get them, the new routines - all these were not only unfamiliar but the expectations were set very high and seemed uncompromising, especially to the children who were already pupils at the school and used to a very different type of school. My daughter came home upset and exhausted, not because she had had to change her behaviour but because she had been expected, along with her peers, to repeat routines until everyone in the class was following them diligently. She had found it very frustrating and tiring and she was not alone. She vented her feelings to me and I listened, sympathised and then explained to her why the first day had been so difficult and what staff, now familiar with the Ark system, had been hoping to achieve with what seemed like extremely rigid discipline. I also explained that whilst I totally understood why her day had been so difficult, it was only the first day and standards were being set, finally with strong enough boundaries so there were no grey areas anymore. Whilst most of her teachers in the last two years have been good to very good, the behaviour in her mixed abilities lessons has been pretty poor and it has affected the education she has received. I reminded her that first and foremost, she goes to school to receive an education, both academic and social. Daily and general disruptive behaviour, some of which has been shaped by very low expectations of the children by some staff; weak, confusing or lenient boundaries set by the school; inconsistent consequences and a lack of support from some parents has dogged the school. So to me, it is a no brainer. If the beginning of term is a bit of a shock because the new systems in place are not only strict but having to counter the old systems, we are just going to have to deal with it. I would say however, that I had done my homework. I had visited an Ark school and been in touch with Ark so was aware of what to expect from outset. And, for the record, I don't agree with everything Ark does but was happy to discuss it with the executive head at that school and get his take on it. What was interesting to me about last Monday was that some children hadn't been particularly bothered by a day of endless routines and expectation setting. There was a definite split in the children I know at the school and it didn't seem to correlate to year group, gender, tutor forms or much else. It seemed to depend on the child's personality. That's not to take away from my daughter's feelings but it was reassuring that some kids thought the day was, at worst, boring and some kids enjoyed their day. On Tuesday, when my daughter came home, she was more settled and had had an alright day. At one point, she even said that though she could see the long term gains to be made by some of the new systems in place, they were tedious nonetheless. Most importantly, her lessons had been good and she liked her teachers. If I'm honest, I was hugely relieved. Since then, behaviour has continued to remain improved and the results of that must be making a big difference, not only to the children but also to the staff. Behaviour in the halls is also better and there is less fighting and aggressive behaviour. I also know that some SEN pupils are finding the calmer, less disruptive environment far easier to navigate and feel happier and more settled and able to follow their lessons.The school is still finding it's feet but as a parent, I am happier for my daughter. The children aren't being asked to do much more than behave respectfully and responsibly and focus on the things they go to school for in the first place.And yes, some of the routines do seem a little odd but I have faith in the teachers who have remained at the school. They know the pupils and I am sure have their best interests at heart.

Ansa Sheikh ● 2691d

I completely agree with you Milena.  As a parent of 2 daughters at AHS I'm in complete support of ARK coming in September and I'm really angry about the strikes.  I think it's outrageous for the NEU to grant this many strike days.  They obviously have no idea how it's affecting all our children and our local community.I hope we see an end to their leaflet distribution asap as it does not give the full picture.NEU say: Higher exclusions numbers in Academies in general.● AHS in the first half of 2017/8 school year had an unprecedented number of permanent exclusions far above the national average.● With established, tried and tested behaviour management systems, Ark’s input will bring stability to the classrooms. Staff will be empowered and supported in enforcing sanctions for poor behaviour. Academies fall under the same rules and regulations as community schools for the enforcement of exclusions in order to protect students from being unfairly treated.NEU say: AHS used to be outstanding● AHS received an outstanding rating in 2006 (Teaching and Learning rated 2), a Good rating in 2009 (Teaching and Learning rated 2 and students attainment 3), a Good rating in 2013 (Teaching and Learning rated 2) and is now in Special Measures.● In August 2017, AHS GCSE results did not reach floor standard. Out of 16 High Schools in Ealing Borough AHS was at the bottom of the list for achievement in GCSEs in 2016 and 2017.● Two Ark schools are in the top 1% of High Schools in the country. Some Ark schools achieve a +1 progress 8 score. This means that students leave school achieving a whole grade above their expected grade. AHS achieved a -0.54 which is more than half a grade lower than expected.● Teaching and learning of our students has to improve so that they can all reach their full potential. For the past 8+ years parents have been promised improvements but these have only been sporadic, short lived and lacking continuity. Ark will bring proven, rapid improvement that will benefit the children that go to AHS now, not those who are there in 4 years’ time.NEU say: If the school becomes an Ark you child will return to school two weeks later in September 2018. This will mean two weeks of lost learning and two weeks of additional childcare costs.● Ark want to use the first two weeks of term to train staff and ensure an excellent start to rapid improvement. Ark stated in parents’ meetings that lost learning time is made up as the year progresses. All Ark schools in Special Measures have followed this pattern and it has worked well. In addition, the school would not be open to all students for the first 4 days of the term anyway due to staff training and staggered starts for different year groups.● If strike action escalates as planned, there will be far more than 10 days of lost learning. Parents prefer a late opening than strike action during a crucial term for AHS pupils.NEU say: Ark lost over 4 million last year.● “Even London-based Ark Schools, a successful chain operating 35 academies, has concerns. The chain reported a £4.1m operating deficit for 2016-17. This was five times the corresponding deficit of £800,000 in 2015-16. Seven of its 35 academies had deficits in their revenue reserves. [...] Ark Schools said its finances were “very strong”, with reserves of more than £16m. It said its quest to turn around difficult schools resulted in a “planned, short-term deficit”.The Guardian Sat 27 Jan 2018

Katharine Bourner ● 2821d

Thanks Mark. As upset as I am about the escalation of strikes, what struck me when we met with the NEU reps and teachers is that the teachers spoke very eloquently about the children whereas the reps spoke about their opposition to Ark from a political stand point. The thing is that most of us opposing these strikes are left of centre, university educated and have a good idea of how society has reached this point. But the pivotal issues, the reasons why the strikes are happening is what needs to be addressed here. The NEU must be in discussions with academy trusts and central government on an on-going basis. As parents, what are we meant to support? Look at the evidence, there have been so many lost years here. The bright children at AHS do well. Most will have parental support of the kind that underpins the education a child will receive at their school. They also get the best teachers in the top sets. So many of the teachers at AHS are impressive. And you are right, they have intentionally chosen to work at a school like AHS. My first post on this subject stated that AHS has had a number of factors against it from the get go. It is the only non-selective school in Acton which means the school has a disproportionate number of boys, SEN pupils, EAL pupils and refugee pupils - all of whom we are so happy to have in our school community. And all the other schools in Acton that have admission policies that deliberately exclude the local community have, to my mind, a lot to answer for. But that's a difference thread for another day! The families of AHS deeply value the diversity of the pupil population at the school and we want a school that educates and elevates all the children at the school. I think it's too much for the LA to do alone and I don't know enough about the NEU. The more research I do into effective education, the more I think that the children at AHS would really benefit from this change.I am not a natural supporter of the academisation policies of New Labour, and now Conservative governments, but I do believe very passionately that the better the education my child gets, the more interesting and fulfilling her life will potentially be. She will have choices that she won't have without that education. If she chooses, she will be able to travel, meet interesting people, do engaging and hopefully, important work for the society she lives in. If it takes the charitable trust set up by a punch of "Tory hedge fund managers" to give her that, well, I'll have to swallow it until governments understand that party politics should be kept away from education policies and that education requires long term investment, and I'm not just talking financial.

Ansa Sheikh ● 2821d

I don't know why Ark weren't able to come to the table earlier. I think there is a procedure that has to be followed but don't quote me as I'm not very familiar with these things. As for the striking teachers casually considering the impact on the children, I don't think it's quite that straightforward. I suspect, and these are just my personal thoughts on the matter, that teachers felt they had no choice but to strike given the circumstances they were facing. Under the original ballot paper three issues were listed according to The Teacher this month. Strike action was planned against the previous (now suspended) head and deputy, behaviour and safety in the school and Ark coming in. I think there was profound unhappiness and anger and when strike action was being planned and the ballot submitted (again, sorry, I'm completely ignorant on how these things happen), all three issues were pertinent. However, two of this issues are being addressed very seriously. The previous head and deputy have been suspended and there is an investigation under way and a behaviour audit has been conducted by John Noel, Assistant Head and Director of Pupil Progress (inclusion) at Featherstone High School and the feedback from staff is that the work he is very good and he is supporting them. So we have one issue left on the ballot paper but the strikes were planned against all three issues. The NEU won't re ballot on just Ark. So here we are, three days of strikes per week which is completely disproportionate to the remaining issue. Pupils and parents are having to work out how to manage this and there has been no compromise on the NEU's parts. The planned escalation would have upset me but kind of made sense when you were wanting people to sit up and think about "bullying, nepotism and a culture of intimidation". Those are hard issues to manage. But now, I think it's just wrong. The right to strike is an important right and unions play an important role in all areas of the workforce but it is as much a responsibility as a right and this strike is now, with just one unresolved issue left on the ballot paper, irresponsible. Just because three days a week were planned, it does not mean three days a week have to be stuck to. With regards to a lack of effort on behalf of the teaching staff, I was trying to find data to see exactly what sort of position AHS was in before this whole mess started. Please look at this: www.compare-school-performance.service.gov.uk/school/101932 .It doesn't make comfortable reading. Something is not going right at the school. If it's not effort, than it's effectiveness. For such an important and crucial profession as teaching, the teachers must want all their efforts to be effective, otherwise what's the point?  

Ansa Sheikh ● 2822d

What I see emerging at AHS is a Union that is causing as much harm to the reputation of the school in the local community as it can.I find it unforgivable that striking teachers are targeting local primary schools (potential new parent and children of AHS) with incorrect facts leaflets, canvassing the High street, Acton Market Place and all the local train stations trying to galvanise local support. Obviously not the idea of someone who lives in the community!!However, where is their support for our children who are looked at scornfully and being ridiculed on their way to and from school by children from other schools,  Our children  don't know from one day to the next whether they will have a teacher to teach them that day.  My year 7 daughter is tired of having to defend herself for her choice of school.I find it irresponsible and in my opinion, arrogant that the union reps continue to call for strike action so near the TUPE being initiated, as well as not listening to their members, that I understand want to have another ballot to call off strike action.Of course I don't want the school to be an academy, but that ship has sailed and the only way forward, for the sake of our kids and the continuity for education is for the ARK to take over and give our kids a good chance to succeed.  I do not believe that the ARK will change the school significantly, nor impose draconian Terms and conditions on on teachers, as it would not be in the best interests of current and future pupil success.Silent Majority, you certainly are not!!!! I would have respect for you if you came out for the shadows.  You do the union a disservice!

Jo Poole ● 2824d

Whatever the goings on, our daughter is starting her GCSE exams next week. Today only two of her teachers were in class, the other ones were (being paid by the union apparently to) strike.A.H.S. Interim Management is doing its very best to support the year 11 pupils and has supplied alternative teachers, extra study materials etc. The reality is that my child is well and truly fed up with the strikes and the effect it is having on her studies. We strongly feel the Union Strikes are harming her GCSE prospects and the strikes are demoralising and harming the students. All children have the right to a good education and should not be used as political pawns by any Union.  From the Union leaflets, containing incorrect facts, nor from the spouting Union Reps, we still have not been able to figure out exactly what the Union wants, as their goal posts seem to shift over time. Rather than discuss matters like grown ups, the Union Reps seem to just call out for more strike days(up to three a week apparently. There is no consideration for the students, nor for the childcare problems this causes for the parents.  Acton High has long suffered from a terribly bad reputation and it needs a seismic shift to change it to an outstanding school.  It has good facilities and raw student material. There are some amazing, hard working and inspirational teachers, but not enough.  If that desperately needed seismic change has to happen through academisation, then so be it and let it happen sooner rather than later, so we can confidently let our daughter do her A-levels at our local community school! 

Ireen Esmann ● 2825d

Thank you for taking the time to explain things from a different point of view. I would like to reply, citing some of the things that were explained to me and a group of other parents who met with the NEU representatives (reps) and striking staff last week at AHS. Now that the head and deputy have been suspended and there is an investigation under way, I don’t think there is any point in discussing this matter further. They clearly did not have the school’s best interests at heart and I, for one, am glad we can now move forward. From what I have heard, it is usually Ark’s policy to retain a SLT as that helps with the transition from LA to the trust.  Personally, I very much hope the current SLT are left in place. Ark probably wouldn’t know much about the school as I think they were approached. I am glad that they are willing to spend time coming in and getting a more comprehensive understanding of the school than coming in with their own preconceptions and ideas about what they are going to change. It is not in Ark’s interest to let AHS fail. Why would they take on the school? It makes no sense to be dubious of their intentions and whatever questions you have, put it to Ark in the same way we are. You are the teachers in the school and have every right to ask your own questions. The NEU represent you, you don’t represent them so ask everything that is on your mind but ask it of the right people. Ark Soane was in the planning stages for a while before Ark was approached about AHS. To my mind, having an Ark academy less than 500 yards from AHS only reinforces the need for a strong and established MAT to come to AHS. The school will lose pupils at an alarming rate if left under the LA. I don’t think there will be an AHS in a few years’ time. The school has a deficit of £400K that they have carried forward from last year. Next year it will be worse as pupil numbers will be down unless something radical but proven happens at AHS. The school is currently staffed at a ten form entry intake. Full capacity for a year 7 intake is 270 pupils but a few weeks ago, it was at 170 and now it’s falling fast and that’s not solely because Ark are coming in as the NEU would have us all believe.  When we met with the NEU reps, they cited the loss of jobs when Ark come in. We were asked if we could look at the staff who would lose their jobs in the eye because they had mortgages and children too. The fact is that there has to be a restructuring at the school regardless of Ark and jobs will, very sadly, go. There are too many staff for the number of pupils and there isn’t the money to support the current level of employees. It is the responsibility of the SLT and Governing Board (GB) to manage the budget with due diligence, especially when in deficit and especially when the deficit will continue to grow in the coming years. Almost every school is facing this crisis to some degree. From speaking to a few staff at AHS, a number of teachers are leaving for a number of reasons, not just Ark. In the same way that parents feel fatigue at the failings at AHS, I have been told that staff feel fatigue at the chaos that has reigned and, as stated in this month’s The Teacher, “a culture of nepotism and intimidation”. I think we are all fed up of this merry go round and just want to get off. The only difference between staff and pupils is that staff can look for jobs elsewhere, whereas spaces in good schools in the borough of Ealing and surrounding boroughs are non-existent.  I don’t mean to sound flippant, I have worked in schools and know what it feels like to be attached to a school and the pupils but speaking purely in terms of numbers, a teacher shortage in London means jobs are available but school spaces are not. With regards to not settling for the only choice AHS has, that’s a valid point but no other MAT was willing to take on AHS. Various trusts were approached and all turned AHS down. They knew Ark were opening down the road and they didn’t feel that they could compete. There was also the issue of the building being a PFI, which most trusts aren’t interested in. From the conversations I have had, even though Ark was the only option, the SLT and GB felt it was a good option because it allows autonomy. Each Ark academy functions as its own independent school, unlike schools under some other MATs. They have thirty six schools, twenty four of which were in special measures and none of them are anymore. They have the proved record parents are looking for. The suggestion that the NEU could run the schools with the LA and get it up to a desirable standard for potential sponsors confuses me. Why wasn't that happening already? Why weren't the NEU members working towards that the whole time?  When I sit in a meeting with NEU representatives and I hear that 30% of staff are not implementing procedures brought in by the teaching and learning deputy head, the only question that comes to mind is “why not?”. Do 30% of teachers think they know better than the person brought in to improve teaching and learning? Does this 30% also include the teachers who have been at the school so long that they feel no-one has a right to question their methods?  I would be interested in seeing these teachers’ assessment results and observe their teaching methods. From a parent’s point of view, if it’s a question of 30% teachers unwilling to take on board new strategies vs 30% NQTs who follow the strategies, I know what I would choose for my child. If teachers don’t listen to people above them, why should pupils listen to teachers? If I didn’t listen to the people above me in my work place, I suspect at some point they would want me out. If, however, I could prove that I am beyond competent, and that would have to be evidence based, then perhaps those same people would be willing to hear me out. I’m sorry to say but this was just one illustrative example which made me think that if left to the NEU, this school would not be run for the benefit of the children there. Other examples are the seemingly ever-changing demands of the NEU. First, we were told in that meeting that the reasons for the strikes was that Ark weren’t coming to the table. Last week, the NEU was informed that Ark were willing to come to the table and TUPE was postponed as a result. So, why are strikes continuing this week? It is mid-May, public exam season and you are all playing God with these pupils’ lives.There were also two other issues on the ballot paper which are being dealt with and the NEU don't seem to have made any concessions for these but seem to be demanding an awful lot from everyone else. One final point about trusting the NEU to improve the school. There has to be some collective responsibility taken for the sub- standard results and attainment levels at AHS. Where has the NEU been to help get the standards up in the past? Very few parents would be willing to approve of what seems like an experiment with our children’s education. Who will you be responsible to if you fail? Who will get the blame then? At the meeting Mike Willmott told us that the teachers’ current contractual hours were 8.30am to 3.30pm and that after Ark come in, it would be 8am to 5pm (this is to the best of my recollection). Marking would be done outside of these times but given the minimal amount of homework my daughter currently gets, I don’t think it’ll make that much of a difference. We were also told that full sick pay would be reduced from 100 days to 25 days. As someone who is self-employed, I don’t get 1 day’s paid sick leave. Nor do I get paid sick leave if my child is sick. And though my working day is set around schools hours, most parents I know work from 9am to 6pm. So yes, I agree, of course everyone needs a work-life balance but hours under Ark are not pushing that balance over the cliff edge. Surely, most teachers work those hours already? Though I’m not a teacher, I worked from 8.15am to 6pm most days when I worked in a school. On the upside, at least schools holidays would remain intact. Of course, parents want enthusiastic and engaging teachers but similarly, we want teachers with integrity. All the striking teachers are being paid on the days they strike by the NEU. None of them seem to be on the picket line beyond 9.30am. They are receiving money not to work and don’t even have the integrity to stand by their actions. Where are all these striking teachers on these strikingly warm and sunny days? How can you expect parents to trust any of these teachers come September? There probably will be a large number of teachers leaving but if you ask parents now, as a result of the teachers’ behaviour, the parents are willing to see them go. The good ones who have integrity and/or are not striking will stay, they are not stupid. With regards to a broad and varied curriculum, that is a very important point and I will do some research into the curriculums most commonly found at Ark academies. We do all want the same thing but when parents are faced with: inaccurate leaflets inciting people; a “Save Our School rally” planned for 16th May; calls for a march down to Ealing Town Hall; striking teachers targeting locals in the town centre, at train/tube stations and most abhorrently, at primary schools, it is very hard to see how a balanced debate can follow. Personally, I would like to see the discussion between Ark and the NEU/teachers. Some of your claims are alarming and I can't understand how the thirty six Ark academies are fully staffed when conditions sound so hellish. This strike is about the terms and conditions for the teachers (by no means an unimportant issue). Stefan Simms told us so at the meeting. If the NEU get their terms and conditions met, they will call off the strike and all conversations about the pupils; the SEN pupils; the community; the behaviour management policies; the Ark ethos; the Tory hedge fund spin and so on, all that will be put to one side. It’s gobsmacking how you are all willing to use all these issues to get people on side but when the chips are down, they mean nothing. 

Ansa Sheikh ● 2825d

I feel like I need to reply to everyone here. You are all right to suggest that the school needs to change - for too long it has been run badly with poor procedures, behaviour, safeguarding and results. This led to the inadequate Ofsted rating showing a complete failure in every aspect of the school - the rating was entirely deserved. It should be noted that Ofsted focused their classroom observations on supply and newly qualified teachers - if you were cynical you could say deliberately. Teachers at AHS have worked under very challenging circumstances with very challenging pupils for some time. The pupils are part of the reason the job can be rewarding, poor management though is intolerable particularly when it affects pupils as it ultimately does, whether through dangerous corridors or disrupted lessons.When Ark arrived it immediately said the current head and deputy (at the time) would remain. This was unacceptable to NEU members as we had issues with the way they were running the school and their conduct both in and out of school - as did a growing number of parents. As you know the head and deputy have since been removed from the school. Ark also stated they knew nothing about the school so we were dubious of their intentions and ability to improve pupil outcomes. They will also open another school on Gunnersbury Lane - hardly a sign that they are fully committed to AHS.Ark does not publish its staff retention rate as it is poor. AHS staff visited two Ark schools in the area and noted that very few original staff remained in the years after Ark takeovers. Ark's policies see to that. Good staff will leave and pupils will be taught by young trainees and unqualified assistants - cheaper, keen to follow management instructions (however bad) and on Ark's new contracts that do not comply with current, national teachers' pay and conditions. Staff are already leaving because of what is coming. I think parents need to be aware of this.You may feel Ark is the answer and I understand that after the mess the school has got itself into. It is, however, the only option on offer which is never a good way to make such an important decision. The NEU wants time to improve the school, within Ealing LA, to get more academy sponsors to the table. A better sponsor can then be chosen. A sponsor that treats staff as professionals and respects their employment rights and work-life balance is one that nurtures well-being and morale. That leads to enthusiastic and engaging teachers delivering outstanding lessons. The Ark model cannot achieve this. In time you will see excellent teachers disappear and a narrow, academic, exam-focused curriculum emerge.I've tried to be fair here and counter some of the misinformation you have whilst addressing some concerns. It may work for you on paper and it may work in practice just long enough to get your child through in some subjects but Ark threatens the survival of a comprehensive, community school that is there for all which you mention attracted you to the school in the first place just as it did those that work there.Please come to the public meeting on 16th May 6:45PM, St Mary’s Church, 1 The Mount, W3 9NW (Opposite Morrisons) where people will be happy to talk to you about your concerns. Ultimately we all want the same thing - young people learning and making the best of themselves and others. We don't think Ark is the way to do this.

Ann Smith ● 2826d

I completely agree with both Milena and Ansa.I have two children at AHS.  I put AHS as my first choice school when selecting for my son who is now in year 9 and also for my daughter year 7.    Would I have chosen Acton High if there was a choice?  With it’s track record, probably not.  I put it down as first choice as it’s my local comprehensive school, I wanted to support it and it was the only realistic ‘choice’ I had.    The only other options available were  a) move house  b) go to church (I have no intention of faking being a believer every Sunday c) payI have always been against academisation but I will welcome Ark Academy with open arms.  I strongly believe that it will be able to make the huge improvements that AHS needs right now.  The school cannot stay as it is or drift as an ‘orphan' school as is being offered up by the NEU.  The school needs a strong supported leadership and most importantly stability.  I’ve watched the school make small steps to change and they are implementing some new methods of teaching and assessment but these are tiny steps.  AHS needs to make a giant leap to be a flourishing local community school that people choose to send their children to.  STRIKING TEACHERS Acton High has to become an academy,  it has no choice.  This is a government decision not a school decision or a governors decision.  Striking won’t change that decision.The school failed its Ofsted report.  The quality of teaching was deemed inadequate and although this wasn’t the only area of inadequacy, quite clearly the teaching was not judged to be good enough.  Saying that, some of my children’s teachers are excellent and I hope they stay when the Ark Academy take over.  I hope they seize the opportunity to work in a school run by a MAT with a proven track record of running 35 successful schools with good or outstanding Ofsted reports.  I find it hard to believe that the teachers are striking against this transition.    Who wouldn’t want to learn and develop their skills in a company that in the words of the Ark Regional Director 'prides itself on curriculum development,  staff development, pastoral support, pathways and enrichment and in developing good school leaders’    Yes, Ark is a business and for businesses to succeed you need to have results.  This is why it is a success.  The ongoing strike action is potentially catastrophic for Acton High School.  If there is one thing that could make this already sinking ship sink further is continuing with the strikes.    Nobody in their right mind would want to send their children to a school with such instability, especially if the union had their way and send them to an ‘orphan’ school.  Come autumn when people make their school choices they won’t forget this.    You will find the intake of 2019 will be a majority of disappointed an unmotivated children.  Children who have been forced to go to their sixth choice school.  Many will have their names down at other schools in case a place becomes available for them and they’ll be of as soon as one does.      If Ark Academy take over, it will be a very different picture. The union has to realise how much the children are suffering.  Children about to take their GCSE’s and A levels this term.  How can we can send our children to a school where the teachers and union think it is acceptable to strike during this crucial term.  Yes, the children taking exams are being asked to go in but up until this week there were no teachers there to teach them.    Not all teachers agree with the strikes,  I know that some feel very frustrated and are really struggling knowing that they are letting the children down. Personally I blame a stubborn union with it’s own political agenda.  They have a bigger battle to fight.  I just wish they could find a way of doing it without it being to the detriment to our children's education.

Debbie Carmichael ● 2826d

I agree Milena. I have always questioned academisation but, in this instance, I think Acton High School (AHS) will benefit hugely from becoming an Ark Academy. In recent years, Ark seems to have secured a good reputation for taking on struggling schools and turning them around. The GCSE and A'level results in most Ark academies are good, much better than the current AHS results. Acton High has always had the misfortune of being the only non-selective, co-ed state secondary school in Acton. Sounds great but that only benefits a community when there is a choice of non-selective, co-ed schools, not when the system is stacked against you from the get go. I remember when I first started looking at secondary schools and realised that the three local "choices"  we had were just a mirage. I had the “choice” of two schools for my daughter and will only have the “choice” of one when my son goes to secondary school. Acton, as we all know, has one girls school (Ellen Wilkinson), one faith school (Twyford) and one truly non-selective, co-ed school (AHS). Because of the selective admissions policy of both the former schools, AHS is left with a disproportionately high number of boys. It also has a very high Special Educational Needs intake.  My daughter is in Year 8 at AHS and it has not always been an easy ride. Some of her teachers are fantastic; passionate about their subject, ambitious for their pupils, respected but approachable. Others are not. What has struck me about AHS is that it can never be consistently good and that’s why I think it has such a poor reputation. The positive aspects of the school do not seem to develop, embed and mature. It is like being on a never ending roller-coaster. Speaking as a parent whose child is now coming to the end of her second year, I welcome Ark. The behaviour at the school has, at times, been so shocking that I have really struggled keeping her there. The teaching is variable and I am, and I am not alone here, sick of parents who made different choices for their children looking on at us with concern. I did not want my daughter to go to a girls’ school and I am not particularly religious, nor am I willing to attend a church (or my equivalent), without having a firm belief, to fulfill the criteria to get my child into a school. For as long as these are the choices presented to the non-denominational families of Acton, AHS will always be facing an uphill battle. But with an academy like Ark behind it, I think it has a chance to be (and importantly, be perceived as) an equally good school. Lots of things need to change for AHS so that it can truly stand out as a consistently good community school, one that serves the whole community and is a viable alternative to the other schools. And whether we like it or not, the skewed perception of AHS, as well as the skewed perception, in the opposite direction, of the other schools has blighted AHS for too long.

Ansa Sheikh ● 2827d